Receive reasons to believe
< Find all the Reasons here
EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE
La Bible
n°118

Palestine

1st century

The dissimilarity criterion strengthens the case for the historical reliability of the Gospels

You've probably heard some people say: "The evangelists tell us different versions of the same events; that's proof that they contradict each other and can't be trusted." This is an objection that we often read on the Internet, but it is not taken seriously by academics. In fact, among the criteria of historicity, New Testament specialists use - among others - the criterion of dissimilarity between narratives to attest the reliability of the Gospel texts.

Detail from The discovery of Fra Angelico's empty tomb, 1437-1446, San Marco Museum, Florence / © CC0/wikimedia
Detail from The discovery of Fra Angelico's empty tomb, 1437-1446, San Marco Museum, Florence / © CC0/wikimedia

Reasons to believe:

  • The dissimilarity criterion states the following: if various accounts of the same event agree on the main elements and differ on secondary elements, then the event in question is probably historically true (at least in broad terms).
  • Indeed, when someone fabricates a story from scratch, they generally avoid recounting seemingly contradictory accounts. Instead, to appear credible, they take care to ensure that the different accounts are identical.
  • This rational principle is used in many other areas of everyday life: police investigators and judges use it when listening to what different witnesses to the same event have to say. If all the testimonies are absolutely identical in every respect, there is an obvious suspicion of conspiracy. On the contrary, the fact that witnesses present slightly different versions of the same event attests to the independence and sincerity of each person's version. The witnesses in question did not work together to come up with a perfectly harmonious account.
  • Applied to the Gospels, this criterion of dissimilarity makes it possible to reinforce the historicity of many passages that some skeptics accuse of being contradictory. In reality, the fact that the evangelists did not want to hide these "apparent contradictions" shows that they were honest in what they reported, and that their testimony is historically credible.

Summary:

The fact that the Gospel texts report different versions of the same event is not enough for New Testament historians to reject them for being contradictory and historically erroneous. In fact, having different testimonies does not necessarily imply contradiction, but rather a complementarity of information that tells the same story from different angles.

The excessive accusations of contradictions that we often read on the Internet do not impress historians very much when it comes to the general reliability of the text. Think about it. It would be strange, after all, if the four accounts in the Gospels told exactly the same story down to the last detail. Police investigators know this very well: if the interviewed witnesses give exactly the same account on every point, there is an obvious suspicion of conspiracy. In fact, it would be highly suspicious to find four absolutely identical testimonies, with no secondary details omitted. On the contrary, the investigators expect the versions given by the individuals to be broadly consistent, because they are well aware that when people give truthful accounts, they often differ widely on secondary details. This does not call into question their overall reliability, butshows that everyone gives a different perspective of the same event.

Let's take the skeptics' favorite example: the discrepancy over which women discovered the empty tomb. Which ones are present? The list varies somewhat: according to Mark's Gospel, they are Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome. The Gospel of Matthew reports only Mary of Magdala and "the other Mary", without mentioning Salome. Luke's Gospel simply speaks of a "group of women". Finally, John's Gospel mentions Mary Magdalene and the plausible presence of another group of women (cf. the use of "we" in John 20:2).

Here, the facts are reported in different but not contradictory ways. The historian can conclude from this that we have several independent historical sources which attest that a group of women did indeed discover Jesus' empty tomb three days after the crucifixion. But it would be absurd to conclude, as some skeptics do, that the discovery of the empty tomb is a fiction on the pretext that the accounts differ on secondary details. Indeed, if the evangelists had invented this story of the empty tomb, they would surely have taken care to harmonize the different versions in order to produce a single one. So they cannot be accused of making up a story from scratch.

On this subject, the theologian Henri Blocher quite rightly remarks: "Those who accuse the texts of contradictions seem to us to approach them with a strange rigidity. They would only be happy if the Gospels showed a perfect correspondence from the first reading, if the harmony was immediately obvious and without any obscurity. But that's like expecting the Bible to come out of the blue! Judges are well aware that, in general, testimonies that are all true but independent show considerable variations, and that it is initially difficult to harmonize them. This is due to the difference in points of view, the choice of elements and the elasticity of words. When credible witnesses appear to be in conflict, the judge does not immediately rule that they contradict each other: he tries to reconcile their statements in a plausible way. It is this sympathetic and flexible attitude that the Gospels also deserve. To show that they can be read in a way that does not oppose them is not to make a desperate and dishonest effort to save a sacred text from incoherence; it is simply to grant them the minimum that a man worthy of faith demands " (Henri Blocher, "L'accord des Évangiles et la résurrection", La Bible au microscope, vol. II, Édifac, 2010, p. 81).

Far from being an argument against the reliability of the Gospels, the dissimilarity between the accounts (as in the case of the Passion of Jesus or the discovery of the empty tomb) on the contrary weighs in favour of the general authenticity of the testimony, ruling out any suspicion of conspiracy on the part of the evangelists.

Matthieu Lavagna, author of Soyez rationnel, devenez catholique!


Going further:

Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels, by Jim Warner Wallace, David C Cook; Revised, Updated & Expanded Edition (10th Anniversary Edition) (September 5, 2023)


More information:

Share this reason

THE REASONS FOR THE WEEK

La Bible , Conversions de juifs
D’extraordinaires prophéties annonçaient la venue du Messie
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Straordinarie profezie preannunciavano la venuta del Messia
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Profecías extraordinarias predijeron la venida del Mesías
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
The unique prophecies that announced the Messiah
La Bible
Le Nouveau Testament est fiable, c’est l’archéologie qui le dit
La Bible
Il Nuovo Testamento è affidabile, lo dice l'archeologia
La Bible
Archaeological finds confirm the reliability of the New Testament
La Bible
El Nuevo Testamento es fiable, lo afirma la arqueología
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Le temps de la venue du Messie a aussi été précisément prophétisé
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Anche il tempo della venuta del Messia era stato profetizzato con precisione
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
The time of the coming of the Messiah was accurately prophesied
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
También se profetizó con precisión el momento de la venida del Mesías
La Bible
Les Évangiles ont été écrits trop tôt pour être des légendes
La Bible
I Vangeli sono stati scritti troppo presto per essere delle leggende
La Bible
Los Evangelios se escribieron demasiado pronto para ser leyendas
La Bible
The Gospels were written too early after the facts to be legends
La Bible
Le Nouveau Testament est le manuscrit le mieux attesté de l’Antiquité
La Bible
El Nuevo Testamento es el manuscrito mejor atestiguado de la Antigüedad
La Bible
The New Testament is the best-attested manuscript of Antiquity
La Bible
Le Nouveau Testament n’a pas été corrompu
La Bible
Il Nuovo Testamento non è stato corrotto
La Bible
El Nuevo Testamento no ha sido corrompido
La Bible
The New Testament was not altered
La Bible
L’onomastique est en faveur de la fiabilité historique des Évangiles
La Bible
L'onomastica sostiene l'attendibilità storica dei Vangeli
La Bible
La onomástica apoya la fiabilidad histórica de los Evangelios
La Bible
Onomastics support the historical reliability of the Gospels
Jésus , La Bible
La peinture ultraréaliste des tortures et douleurs du Messie par le prophète Isaïe
Jésus , La Bible
L'immagine estremamente realistica dei supplizi e delle sofferenze del Messia da parte del profeta Isaia
Jésus , La Bible
La descripción hiperrealista que hace el profeta Isaías de las torturas y sufrimientos del Mesías
Jésus , La Bible
The prophet Isaiah's ultra accurate description of the Messiah's sufferings
La Bible
Les auteurs des Évangiles sont des témoins oculaires, ou de proches associés de ces témoins
La Bible
Gli autori dei Vangeli sono testimoni oculari, o loro stretti collaboratori
La Bible
The authors of the Gospels were eyewitnesses, or close contacts of eyewitnesses
La Bible
Los autores de los Evangelios son testigos oculares o allegados de testigos oculares.
Jésus , La Bible
Le prophète Daniel a annoncé un « fils d’homme » qui est le portrait du Christ
Jésus , La Bible
Il profeta Daniele ha annunciato un "figlio dell'uomo" che è il ritratto di Cristo
Jésus , La Bible
Daniel's "Son of Man" is a portrait of Christ
Jésus , La Bible
El profeta Daniel anunció un "hijo del hombre" que es el retrato de Cristo
La Bible
84 détails du livre des Actes des apôtres sont confirmés par l’histoire et l’archéologie
La Bible
84 dettagli del libro degli Atti sono confermati dalla storia e dall'archeologia
La Bible
84 details in Acts verified by historical and archaeological research
La Bible
84 datos del libro de los Hechos de los Apóstoles son confirmados por la historia y la arqueología
La Bible
Le critère d’embarras prouve que les Évangiles ne peuvent pas être un mensonge
La Bible
Il criterio dell'imbarazzo dimostra che i Vangeli non possono essere una menzogna
La Bible
El criterio de la vergüenza demuestra que los Evangelios no pueden ser mentira
La Bible
The criterion of embarrassment proves that the Gospels tell the truth
La Bible
Le critère de dissimilarité renforce la fiabilité des Évangiles
La Bible
Il criterio di dissimilarità rafforza l'attendibilità dei Vangeli
La Bible
The dissimilarity criterion strengthens the case for the historical reliability of the Gospels
La Bible
El criterio de disparidad refuerza la fiabilidad de los Evangelios
La Bible
La prophétie du Temple détruit est stable, malgré Julien l’Apostat