Receive reasons to believe
< Find all the Reasons here
EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE
La Bible
n°112

Palestine

1st century

The criterion of embarrassment proves that the Gospels tell the truth

We established in previous articles that the Gospels are precise and accurate accounts in terms of the objective information and details they contain about first-century Palestine. Given the historical, topographical,archaeological and onomastic data, we can conclude that the Evangelists were sufficiently well-informed to produce a historically reliable account. On the other hand, how can we be sure that they did not deliberately lie in order to develop their religious propaganda, while at the same time peppering their account with accurate historical and geographical details? The criterion of embarrassment, a long-standing tool of New Testament research and analysis, is enough to defeat this theory. When one invents a story, one generally avoids self-ridiculing by recounting details that are embarrassing for oneself. But the evangelists did the exact opposite: they recount a good number of embarrassing events that they would certainly not have mentioned if they were lying.

The denial of Peter, depicted here by Caravaggio / © CC0/wikimedia
The denial of Peter, depicted here by Caravaggio / © CC0/wikimedia

Reasons to believe:

Examples that meet the criterion of embarrassment include:

  • Christ's death on the cross, which could not have been invented by the evangelists; particularly if they were trying to make a point about their religion to Jews and pagans.
  • Including women's testimony in the context of the discovery of Jesus' empty tomb, especially a public sinner like Mary Magdalene. This could only discredit them in the eyes of the Jews. If the evangelists wanted to lie and invent their own story, they would have chosen to portray men like the apostles in order to reinforce the credibility of their fiction.
  • The ridiculous portrayal of Peter, leader of the apostles, who is severely reprimanded by Jesus and denies him on several occasions. If the Gospels were a story fabricated for the sole purpose of promoting the Christian religion, the early Christians would never have demeaned their leader in this way.
  • The many embarrassing details reported about the disciples: they fled from difficulties, they doubted (Mt 28:17) and did not always understand what Jesus was saying (Lk 24:11; Mt 16:23; Jn 14:9), etc. It would make no sense for Jesus' disciples or the evangelists to have invented these embarrassing elements. These details appear in the Gospels because their authors were concerned to report what really happened.
  • It is therefore impossible to consider that the Gospels are a tissue of fabricated lies. These writings are too embarrassing for the disciples and too "counterproductive" to be lies.

Summary:

Have you ever lied to protect your image or reputation? You may have. But have you ever lied on purpose to damage your reputation in the eyes of others? Certainly not! Human beings do not like to denigrate themselves for the sake of it. If they report something embarrassing, it's because it really happened to them.

The same is true when we look at the embarrassing facts in the Gospels. The Evangelists present the leaders of the Church as often impulsive, incompetent, boastful or stupid. Mark's Gospel describes the disciples as utterly unbelieving, so that Jesus repeatedly accuses them of lacking faith (Mk 9:17-19). They panick when caught in a storm on Lake Tiberias (Mk 4:35-41), and are extremely slow to understand the true meaning of Jesus' words (Mk 4:137:18). When the going gets tough, they act like cowards and frightened unbelievers. Instead of praying with Jesus in preparation for his passion, they fall asleep (Mk 14:37-42). And when Christ is arrested by the chief priests, they flee (Mk 14:50).

The Gospel is particularly humiliating for Peter, the leader of the early Church, who is severely reprimanded by Jesus when he opposes Christ's future death. When Peter says to Jesus, "Lord, this will not happen to you "(Mt 16:22), Jesus replies, "Get behind me, Satan. You are an obstacle to me; for your thoughts are not God's thoughts, but men's"(Mt 16:23). Worse still, Peter proudly asserts that he will never deny Christ - "Even though I should have to die with you, I will not deny you!" (Mt 26:35) - but the Gospels states that Peter actually ends up denying him three times! Nothing could be more humiliating for the head of the apostles. Christians would never have invented such a story.

We can also add that the humiliating event of the crucifixion could not have been invented by the disciples. Clearly, if you think that a man is the Messiah, or at least if you want people to believe that he is, it seems quite stupid to have him crucified and humiliated like a nobody. The Jews of the time expected a strong and brave Messiah: the idea of crucifixion was unthinkable for them. Why claim loud and clear that Jesus is God, and create a scenario in which he dies a miserable death by being nailed on a instrument of torture reserved to criminals? In terms of credibility, it's hard to do much worse if you want to convince people of the truth of your religion and have them join your ranks. In the second century, the anti-Christian polemicist Celsus took great pleasure in ridiculing Christians for this very fact: "You give us for God a person who led an infamous life and died a miserable death" (A Discourse Against the Christians).

Finally, the Gospels state that it was the women who went to the tomb the next day and found it empty. At the time, however, a woman's testimony had no value before the Jewish courts. It was not even admissible in a legal case. This is exactly the kind of narrative element that a convincing invented account would have omitted, because in the society of the time, reporting such a detail was tantamount to exposing one's own account to derision and mockery.

Consequently, if the discovery of the empty tomb were a legend, the inventors of the story would have made sure that the first witnesses to the resurrection were men. They would have avoided undermining the credibility of their story in this largely patriarchal culture. This is why historian N. T. Wright remarked: "As historians, we are obliged to say that, if these stories had been invented five years later, [their authors] would never have attributed the discovery of the empty tomb to Mary Magdalene. For Christian apologists, trying to explain to a sceptical public that Jesus rose from the dead by invoking women would be like shooting yourself in the foot. But for us historians, it's a golden piece of information. Christians could never have invented such a thing" (quoted in Antony Flew's There is a God, HarperCollins, 2009, p. 207).

In short, the Gospels contain events so embarrassing that their authors would never have invented such things to promote their religion and go out to evangelize the nations. They ran the constant risk of being ridiculed in the eyes of the Jews and pagans. These facts are only known to us because the evangelists were honest and wanted to meticulously transcribe the events of Jesus' life, despite the humiliating consequences for them.

In short, the hypothesis of a lie is untenable. Moreover, it would imply that the apostles were masochistic impostors, ready to demean themselves for things they knew to be false. The least we can grant them is that they were honest and intended to report accurate facts about the life of Christ.

The criterion of embarrassment thus serves to reinforce the historical credibility of the Gospels, and in this way constitutes a solid reason for believing in Christianity.

Matthieu Lavagna, author of Soyez rationnel, devenez catholique!


Going further:

The Historical Reliability of the New Testament: Countering the Challenges to Evangelical Christian Beliefs​​​​​, by Craig L. Blomberg, B&H Academic (November 1, 2016)


More information:

Share this reason

THE REASONS FOR THE WEEK

La Bible , Conversions de juifs
D’extraordinaires prophéties annonçaient la venue du Messie
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Straordinarie profezie preannunciavano la venuta del Messia
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Profecías extraordinarias predijeron la venida del Mesías
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
The unique prophecies that announced the Messiah
La Bible
Le Nouveau Testament est fiable, c’est l’archéologie qui le dit
La Bible
Il Nuovo Testamento è affidabile, lo dice l'archeologia
La Bible
Archaeological finds confirm the reliability of the New Testament
La Bible
El Nuevo Testamento es fiable, lo afirma la arqueología
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Le temps de la venue du Messie a aussi été précisément prophétisé
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
Anche il tempo della venuta del Messia era stato profetizzato con precisione
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
The time of the coming of the Messiah was accurately prophesied
La Bible , Conversions de juifs
También se profetizó con precisión el momento de la venida del Mesías
La Bible
Les Évangiles ont été écrits trop tôt pour être des légendes
La Bible
I Vangeli sono stati scritti troppo presto per essere delle leggende
La Bible
Los Evangelios se escribieron demasiado pronto para ser leyendas
La Bible
The Gospels were written too early after the facts to be legends
La Bible
Le Nouveau Testament est le manuscrit le mieux attesté de l’Antiquité
La Bible
El Nuevo Testamento es el manuscrito mejor atestiguado de la Antigüedad
La Bible
The New Testament is the best-attested manuscript of Antiquity
La Bible
Le Nouveau Testament n’a pas été corrompu
La Bible
Il Nuovo Testamento non è stato corrotto
La Bible
El Nuevo Testamento no ha sido corrompido
La Bible
The New Testament was not altered
La Bible
L’onomastique est en faveur de la fiabilité historique des Évangiles
La Bible
L'onomastica sostiene l'attendibilità storica dei Vangeli
La Bible
La onomástica apoya la fiabilidad histórica de los Evangelios
La Bible
Onomastics support the historical reliability of the Gospels
Jésus , La Bible
La peinture ultraréaliste des tortures et douleurs du Messie par le prophète Isaïe
Jésus , La Bible
L'immagine estremamente realistica dei supplizi e delle sofferenze del Messia da parte del profeta Isaia
Jésus , La Bible
La descripción hiperrealista que hace el profeta Isaías de las torturas y sufrimientos del Mesías
Jésus , La Bible
The prophet Isaiah's ultra accurate description of the Messiah's sufferings
La Bible
Les auteurs des Évangiles sont des témoins oculaires, ou de proches associés de ces témoins
La Bible
Gli autori dei Vangeli sono testimoni oculari, o loro stretti collaboratori
La Bible
The authors of the Gospels were eyewitnesses, or close contacts of eyewitnesses
La Bible
Los autores de los Evangelios son testigos oculares o allegados de testigos oculares.
Jésus , La Bible
Le prophète Daniel a annoncé un « fils d’homme » qui est le portrait du Christ
Jésus , La Bible
Il profeta Daniele ha annunciato un "figlio dell'uomo" che è il ritratto di Cristo
Jésus , La Bible
Daniel's "Son of Man" is a portrait of Christ
Jésus , La Bible
El profeta Daniel anunció un "hijo del hombre" que es el retrato de Cristo
La Bible
84 détails du livre des Actes des apôtres sont confirmés par l’histoire et l’archéologie
La Bible
84 dettagli del libro degli Atti sono confermati dalla storia e dall'archeologia
La Bible
84 details in Acts verified by historical and archaeological research
La Bible
84 datos del libro de los Hechos de los Apóstoles son confirmados por la historia y la arqueología
La Bible
Le critère d’embarras prouve que les Évangiles ne peuvent pas être un mensonge
La Bible
Il criterio dell'imbarazzo dimostra che i Vangeli non possono essere una menzogna
La Bible
El criterio de la vergüenza demuestra que los Evangelios no pueden ser mentira
La Bible
The criterion of embarrassment proves that the Gospels tell the truth
La Bible
Le critère de dissimilarité renforce la fiabilité des Évangiles
La Bible
Il criterio di dissimilarità rafforza l'attendibilità dei Vangeli
La Bible
The dissimilarity criterion strengthens the case for the historical reliability of the Gospels
La Bible
El criterio de disparidad refuerza la fiabilidad de los Evangelios
La Bible
La prophétie du Temple détruit est stable, malgré Julien l’Apostat